Mei-US events, microblogging Secretary, VIP certification fees, old news when the news, spam, rumors, verbal abuse ... ... a lot of events microblogging own people think and once again become a topic of concern, some people call it "microblogging chaos" , also called micro-Bo is a "double-edged sword."
Numerous micro-blog the event what is not "chaos", a lot of negative press behind, they should be what is governance? Dean of Renmin University of China, said Yu Guoming: "an isolated incident does not represent the whole, microblogging shown negative events have not, certainly, but not the mainstream, if that is chaos, it means the mainstream is so large part of the case, patently not. "
Microblogging not critics said the chaos, but not without a place in need of treatment, to balance the right to freedom of expression and the right to express the bottom line.
Microblogging frequent events
Recently, microblogging on various "events occur frequently," Mei-US events, microblogging Secretary events, etc., to show off their wealth into microblogging and communication platform affair, the proliferation of verbal abuse, rumors are also a lot of people on Internet users and microblogging minor complaints, charges certification, microblogging advertising, etc., then let critics worry, this commercial will not erode the freedom of a world public opinion?
Some people have a flood of events called "microblogging chaos", which, Yu Guoming said: "Since that chaos should be universal, in fact, no data show that more of these events is universal , are the case, not the mainstream microblogging, microblogging is not the majority of the contents are similar. "
In fact, the cause for concern often the case, and universal phenomenon is often ignored, even in the "everybody media" micro-Bo, also the same. Yu Guoming said: "Whether critics, researchers, or media, there should be an objective judge, should not be the case as a general phenomenon, known as 'chaos' and the like words, but should be careful today's microblogging, apparently far from the chaos. and these events are not unique to microblogging, microblogging is not arising because of, not to look at it as a phenomenon of microblogging. "
Rumor has never been there
Some critics have said that microblogging is a "double-edged sword" in the micro-blog, rumors spread, abuse, etc. often irrational behavior. Use microblogging to profit is to be criticized, but in Yu Guoming, these phenomena can not explain microblogging problem.
Yu Guoming said: "First of all, gossip, rumors, etc., not because microblogging generated, but the there, but in the traditional media age, people can not communicate so smooth, you just do not know each other, while with the micro- Bo, it is easy to know what each other are concerned, so some people feel has become a problem. "
The proliferation of advertising on the micro-Bo, is the use of the VIP business certification, many people expressed dissatisfaction, Yu Guoming said: "In fact, all the influential, to be of value where the shadow of a certain interest groups, profit-driven business , unscrupulous traders even less scruples, but these issues are not the same issue of microblogging, microblogging is just a tool, a communication platform, the tool itself is no problem, problem is people, so that should be against the unscrupulous businessmen, rather than microblogging itself. "
In addition, the extreme views on the micro-Bo, Yu Guoming that should be tolerant, he said: "Internet users, ordinary people in the new media to show enthusiasm, which is consistent and modern society the same time, a person's expression of error is normal, no one can always correct In fact, the Internet, personal extreme speech can easily be flooded if the expression and the debate can remain free and clear, there will be no radical remarks living space, the error message also will soon disappear, or be corrected. "
Should control what?
Chaos microblogging event, attracted a lot of words to control microblogging, microblogging really need it management, what should the governance?
Yu Guoming said: "The behavior of the users as chaos, it is not right, not as the object of governance is more fact, on the network, individual speech and behavior, most will not become a social phenomenon, social events, the impact did not imagine so much the contrary, I'm more organized behavior, such as promoter, interest groups, etc., their behavior is easier to drive others, resulting in relatively large influence. "
Business microblogging erosion, but also should be noted, Yu Guoming said: "The commercial activity itself is no problem, but the commercial activity should have its own rules, really need to pay attention to is illegal business practices. Microblogging is an emerging media, which the system has not improved, so a lot of unscrupulous traders to the loopholes can be drilled, so there should be a common rule, or law to regulate and constraints. This is not easy, in fact, Internet users behavior is often on the surface, while business groups are more behind the scenes, their own hiding place, and always conduct business users do look like a spontaneous, Internet users to find them much more difficult than condemnation. "
Note that, standardize business practices, not refuse business, Yu Guoming said: "This specification should be rational, there is a rule that allows it to meet within the law in accordance with the rules the way, not all business behavior expelled out. "
Everyone had to abide by the rules
Microblogging not critics said the chaos, but not without a place in need of treatment, some critics suggested that "to balance the right to freedom of expression and expression of the bottom right hand must fully respect 'from the media', or individual rights of expression. then let him go to be discouraged, but also under control, let him know, to express a certain bottom line. "However, the problem is, so how to achieve balance and governance? Is to rely on the traditional government-run, or rely on community self-management?
Yu Guoming said: "Today's manager should change the thinking, the past, paternalistic management style is clearly inappropriate. Paternalistic management in any country, there have been any society, whether it is arbiter style or just Robin Hood type Ye Hao, in a particular era they have played a role, but as social development, complexity, the higher the degree of civilization, paternalistic management of the less fit in today, in the past that closed-end management of the inevitable to be transformed into an open style of management, from relying on government into social self, the community or the management of various non-governmental organizations. "
More importantly, when the management has become a common form of collaboration, the managers no longer just the rule-makers, is also to comply with those, Yu Guoming said: "There should be a universal and effective rules to bind all person, whether by managers, or managers themselves, are bound by the same rules, while this is today's managers should think about. "
Morning News reporter Zhou Huaizong
No comments:
Post a Comment