Microblogging original rights worth it?
140 word short is writing again
"I'm just looking for a I just wrote to it, and found that 195 people actually verbatim copying, almost did not mark the source!" Recently, the Innovation Works CEO Kai-recurrence of a micro-Bo, again so that "140 words Copyright "coming into sight, and he has the same trouble as well a writer Zheng Yuanjie, 1166. With the right celebrity for the original micro Bovee contrast, ordinary users are mostly disagree, many people think, "Use your words, think highly of you." 140 words microblogging copyright in the end that should not seriously?
Author: microblogging is the creation of short again
"Please change your busy schedule even a punctuation mark ah the article, although material from the news, but the process requires the formation of the text view, and text to determine the permutations and combinations, is the creation!" Writer Zheng Yuanjie executives recently criticized a site do not change a word to copy their own micro-blog. "Reader" magazine on the microblogging reference sixty-six sentence, "the woman from the novelty, change, seeking to find comfort when the United States, is old," neither this nor to pay royalties, 66 altogether lawyer for their own rights.
With the increasing influence micro-Bo, and many original quotations from newspapers and books are used in major Digest. A staff member told reporters that the user has registered the terms specified micro-Bo, uploaded to the publicly available any content area, the site owner to use, copy, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works right, in other words , and greeting sites can. Writers Akashi said he created the microblogging as a draft after finishing the book for end integration, the minimum royalties or two dollars a word. Off if you want to "steal" the writer is not the loss of light.
Industry: microblogging, though small, does have the copyright
Zhu Wei China University of Political Science Teachers, said the author, as long as the original with the author's expression of thinking, and this expression is "visible and replicate the" intellectual, then it should be copyrighted. Can be seen, the law does not protect the works of copyright restrictions to make the amount of text. So, microblogging is small, does have the copyright.
Zhuge Yi
No comments:
Post a Comment