Shanxi University White For a book disclose the details of the case sued Yan Chong

BEIJING, Taiyuan, July 14 (Xinhua Li lock) 14, Shanxi University, College of Liberal Arts Associate Professor White said recently, the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court has accepted Yan Chong "reward door" case, appeal. In addition, penned by a white square detailing circumstances surrounding the case, the disclosure of details of a case of "sued Yan Chong," a book or publication.

Earlier, White in the "Kangxi Shuntian Chi" Chinese singled out 911 errors, and accordingly to the Beijing Chaoyang court Yan Chong, asked him to fulfill "the" Kangxi Shuntian Chi "pick a mistake to award thousand Yuan "commitment.

In this regard, White's attorney, Wang Deyi, said White v. Yan Chong reward ad dispute by the Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court accepted, the Chaoyang Court in 2011 April 14, Kusakabe the first instance verdict, to "even though a reporter that Yan Chong presentation is aimed at readers posted ads, but this understanding is, after all, belong to the reporter's subjective feelings, "" The reporter Yan Chong published this statement, they did not consent Yan Chong my express consent and approval "as an excuse, rejected demanded 850,000 yuan of white flat bonus claim. White flat against first-instance ruling, appeal to the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court.

June 27, Yan Chong filed pleadings in that "their ads never Reward meaning 'to pick the wrong remuneration' just and correspondent Liu Ting between individuals in the chat dialogue, not targeted at readers' .

It is understood that, as early as mid-March 2010, the white balance is wrong to reward pick Yan Chong contact with the ground. Since then, claiming Yan Chong assistant who asked White to "pick the wrong article," sent to the specified mailbox, no response. White said, "court not my intention, is Yan Chong's arrogance led to something worse. If things just happened, Yan Chong can positively respond to, consultation process, there would be today."

Before hearing the court repeatedly held, the white average that mediation, conciliation and repeatedly reducing conditions. At the same time, Yan Fang refused mediation from start to finish.

According to Wang Deyi introduced after the first trial against the white level, in the absence of the plaintiff, the Beijing Chaoyang Court unilaterally invite the defendant to provide evidence of their cross-examination.

"After the first trial, the access to files, we found lot of testimony to be read selectively," Wang Deyi, said the judge involved in the proceedings, the court "omitted reading" Beijing Morning Post "reporter Liu Ting Yan Chong reward challenge issued After the wrong manuscript, Yan Chong thanked send text messages, and before the first hearing, Liu Ting, who do not want to become a prosecution witness, "and other key details.

Currently, the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court has engaged the two sides talk to the attorney, will held a public hearing to be determined by the court. (End)